Notes and Quotes
Astrid Ensslin
(beginning on page 145)
The Breathing Wall: http://www.thebreathingwall.com/
The author contends that
we can only use the term “digital literature” if and when the reception process
is guided if not dominated by “literary” means (145).
Interest in close-reading
various forms of digital fiction derives from the distinct narrative techniques
used by digital writers (145).
The author argues that
from the vantage point of reader-response criticism, this spectrum parallels a
move from an aesthetic of revision and revisitation to an aesthetic of retro-intentionalisation
(146).
Hypertext instigates
multilinear reading processes (147).
Some early works of
digital literature emphasize the meta-theoretical component and thereby neglect
the aesthetic effects necessary to attract a non-academic readership (148).
Hypermedia typically
combines a variety of semiotic modes including typography, (scanned)
handwriting, digitized speech, sound and music, pictographic and photographic
images, animation, and film (148).
Cybertext… readers become
part of a cybernetic feedback loop with operates on the basis of mutual
stimulus and response between machine and operator (149).
The author argues that
Aarseth omits two crucial elements contained within conventional communication
models: reference, and the role of the author-programmer (149).
Hyperlinks are not
generally replaced but rather combined with other creative technologies to
produce literary and artistic novelties (150).
The author argues that
all of the new technologies enable writers to use and experiment freely
according to need and mood (151).
Cognitive stylistics uses
the principles of cognitive science to investigate how textual elements evoke
certain psychological patterns and cognitive effects in the reader’s mind
(152).
Empirical stylistics applies
empirical research methods to examine reading and response patterns and
processes (152).
Author argues that
literary criticism still lacks a significant degree of auto-physiological
awareness to complement cognitive stylistics (152).
Retro-intentionalization
(156).
No comments:
Post a Comment