Notes and Quotes
Talan Memmott
(beginning on page 293)
The context in which any
given term is used provides the framework for its definition, however tentative
or temporary. The terms are conveniences—(perhaps) for the sake of argument
(293).
Because digital poetry
cannot be reduced to a genre of poetry, we must begin to consider the applied
poetics of the individual practitioner (294).
The poetics of this piece,
its conceptualization and facilitation, are more important qualities than the
poetry it generates. The intertainment is more potent than the entertainment
(300).
Interactivity is a
slippery concept (301).
Because the
grammatological aspects or signifying harmonics of digital poetry are not
universal, it is essential to understand each digital poetry application as an
environment or poetic microculture with its own grammar and customs (302).
Does digital poetry have
the power, not to define thought but to cause thinking? (303).
We not only read the text
but assist in its de.scription, or ex.position (304).
To an extent, the idea of
taxonomy itself is contrary to the realities of digital practice (304).
There are no guidelines
for creative cultural practice through applied technology, and it is therefore
up to practitioners to develop their own (anti)methods (305).
No comments:
Post a Comment